RSS

Mad Man Mitt: Stuck in Sixties’ Style Sexism

18 Oct

This presidential election has focused a lot of attention on women and winning the female vote, and last night’s debate returned to the topic again when a young woman asked the candidates what they would do to address the problem of unequal pay for equal work. In response, Governor Romney recounted how as governor of Massachusetts, he hired numerous women to work in his administration. He also said that he had to make work hours “more flexible” in order to accommodate his female chief of staff, citing her desire to get home earlier to make dinner for her family and be with her children. On the surface, this response might seem like a good one; Mitt Romney is flexible and doesn’t discriminate against women. In fact, he went out of his way to hire them. But this attitude comes with deeply sexist implications.

Maybe it was true in the fifties and sixties that women were the primary homemakers for their families, and needed to be home to make dinner. But times have changed. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in 2011 that 70.6% of all mothers with children under the age of 18 are in the labor force. You can find more specifics in this study: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/famee.nr0.htm. In addition, more and more men are becoming the primary caretakers for their children (although the number is still relatively low). Mitt Romney’s assumptions on what issues are relevant to women in the workforce aren’t necessarily true anymore as gender roles in our society become less defined.

And frankly, those assumptions are offensive. Women don’t need special accommodation so that they can be home in time to make dinner. They need a partner who is willing to share childcare and homemaking responsibilities equally, and America needs employers who understand that men and women deserve equally flexible hours, to give both parents the opportunity to care for and spend time with their family, as well as equal pay for equal work. (Both candidates somewhat avoided the question regarding equal pay, but if you’re interested, here is a description of the Lilly Ledbetter Act: http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2008/09/15/080915ta_talk_surowiecki.)

This isn’t a problem exclusive to Mitt Romney; politicians and journalists alike often talk about “women’s issues” and the “women’s vote”, as if all women have the same problems and vote the same way. Some issues, of course, are more specific to women, such as access to contraception and gender discrimination. But not all women care about those issues on the same level. And in the twenty-first century, childcare and flexible work hours are no more exclusive to women than unemployment is to men.

The comments Mitt Romney made in the debate Tuesday night, and those other politicians have made before him, are just another kind of sexism. It might be easier for politicians to keep gender roles strict, so they can fit the electorate inside little boxes (or binders) and pander to those issues. But it’s time for us to realize that the structure of our society is changing, and we need to change with it.

Advertisements
 

2 responses to “Mad Man Mitt: Stuck in Sixties’ Style Sexism

  1. catherine1cat

    October 18, 2012 at 11:18 am

    Hi Sarah, excellent post. When I was watching the debate, and Romney made these comments, I could feel that there was something sexist about them but I honestly couldn’t quite place it. You’re right: Romney was speaking on the assumption that women must still be the primary homemaker in the family, regardless of their career paths. This viewpoint is absolutely sexist, and I can see the connect to the fifties and sixties. What do you think that Romney would do about gender discrimination? Do you think that Obama has done, or will do, anything about it himself, aside from signing the Ledbetter law?
    – Cat

     
  2. mhaml13

    October 23, 2012 at 10:07 am

    Very well written posted and I also could hear Romney sound a little sexist even though he might not be trying. I do think women’s rights is an issue, with that said though some people are making it out to be far worse then it is I believe. I am still only in high school so I might not know what i am talking about. I haven’t been out in the work force yet to seen women being treated differently or unequally than men. I did stumble on this report though and was wondering what you thought.
    http://www.americasradionewsnetwork.com/Carrie-Lukas-explains-study-women-paid-more-than-men
    Thanks for posting again.

    Michael Hamlett

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: